Sunday, October 28, 2007

Celebs flag off controversies

When the elephant is down, even an ant kicks it. Or so goes a Chinese proverb. This might well fit the current situation. Celebrities have time and again been roped into controversies surrounding the national flag, much to their surprise.

Months back, actress-cum-cricket anchor Mandira bedi's clothes flagged off a controversy when she was spotted wearing the Indian colours in a disrespectful manner on a television channel, Hosting the live telecast of the Cricket World Cup, she was seen wearing an image of the Indian Tricolour below her waist, which seems to have gone against constitutional norms! Mandira's sari on the occasion had images of national flags of almost all cricket-playing nations printed on it, but it placed the Indian tricolour in a reportedly disrespectful position. However, after big hue and cry, she apologised publicly for her unintended disrespect shown to the national flag.

Now, Aamir Khan seems to have fallen into a fresh flag controversy! He is being alleged to have shown disrespect to the national flag. And this one is pretty serious. A non-bailable warrant is issued against him, which means; he can't walk in and walk out, like what Sanju baba keeps doing. The complainant has reportedly said that Khan had disrespected the national tricolour during inauguration of a car showroom on August 16. He accused that the flags atop the showroom remained hoisted even after the sunset and the showroom employees pulled the flags down in a derogatory manner. Aamir Khan has no way out, but to wait till November 7 for the next court hearing.

Team India could soon be in the dock for allegedly 'insulting' the National Flag. A petition has been filed before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate of Kanpur raising serious objections against the alleged disrespect shown by the team members to the National Flag. The complaint had in it that Dhoni and his men had not only wrapped themselves with the tricolour during the World cup celebrations, but also rolled it on the ground. And ‘spraying of champagne followed this' that fell on the flag. He views the entire act as an insult to the national flag. The Local Magistrate has been admitted the petition. And October 25, 2007 will be the day to decide the fate of Dhoni's men for their alleged disrespect shown to the national flag.

But a cricketer getting into flag controversy is not anything new. Sachin Tendulkar, the darling of cricket lovers was also roped into a similar controversy, few months back. A website -
http://www.headlinesindia.com/ - had stirred up the controversy, splashing pictures of the master batsman cutting the cake in Jamaica with colours of the Indian flag and the Ashok Chakra very much in place at the centre. The function apparently took place on March 10 in the presence of the Indian High Commissioner to Jamaica, K L Agrawal. Later the BCCI officials requested that the issue should not be blown out of proportion.

Tennis sensation, Sania Mirza has not escaped from the flag row. Early in 2006, an advertising campaign, featuring India’s rising star sparked off protests in her hometown, Hyderabad. The Lotto sportswear campaign featured Sania resting her foot on a guitar painted in the colours of the Indian flag. The complainant, Manoj Alexander, president of the Rahul Priyanka Youth Brigade, had said that Sania, while endorsing a foreign brand, was demeaning the Indian flag rather than holding it high.

It’s a well-known fact that we are a country full of Gods and Godmen. Their influence over people is legendary and they have them in awe. But it seems like their devotion had gone overboard. In 2007, two images showing the Indian national flag at the feet of Niramala Srivastava were circulated on the social network Orkut. The picture showed her husband, a former IAS officer and the Secretary General of the Intermaritime Organisation seated next to her. Later, Rajendra Kumar, a trustee of Sahaja Yoga Trust issued an apology on behalf of Nirmala Devi stating that the Sahaja Yogis have the "highest and deepest respect" for the national flag.

What is it with flag and celebrities? Do they really insult it in the real sense? If so, why would they? Why should they be pulled into such controversies?

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Devil's advocate: Case One

One idle afternoon, as I was resting on my cozy cushion, I was thinking about how and when Mr Devil would appear before me with his case!

There he appeared. He looked quite familiar. Tall, dark, handsome? (No, bad luck). He looked like a Bulldog (Guess he read my article on him, where I called him, that way). Outsiders who meet him say he can be friendly and engaging, but behind the smile of the old fox lies the heart of a cold, calculating military tactician. But, Burma's 56 million people like to paint the 74-year-old as an unreasonable tyrant driven by a mixture of greed, fear and superstition.

He is none other than Gen. Than Shwe. The one who is testing the might of the monks of Burma, no, Myanmar (as he calls it, or as the military junta calls it)

I guess Mr Devil had been watching me so long and this is probably a revenge against me. Uh! I hate you..

So, when I asked Mr Devil about what the case was, he says that I should argue for him, that is, against Aung San Suu Kyi.

Oh my god! How can I ever do that? I've been singing songs of praise on her and now, how do I argue against her? Isn't she the xaviour of the Burmese? Hmm, that's how it is for a lawyer. She has to argue even if she is against the case, but will I accept this one? reject it?

"There's no solution, Mr Devil. There's no use arguing against Suu Kyi, when the entire Burma is for her!

You will defenitely lose."

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Yes, your honour!

O thou invisible spirit of wine, if thou hast no name to be known by, let us call thee devil! And Thy shall argue in from of you from today.

Yesterday, I met the devil. I mean, I really did. [chuckles] So, I proposed to him that I would argue for him from today and he has accepted my offer. The devil, who has been considered as the greatest enemy of man, for eternity, should surely not forget to pay me my fees.

You wan't to know what that was? I'll tell you at the end of my first argument.